Sunday, 29 June 2008

Are we all just social insects?

LONDON - MARCH 12:  Naturalist and broadcaster...Ever since i started to become interesting in SEO, i developed a facinastion with how human beings interact online. This community ideal that nolonger exisits in Western society is now blossoming in an untangable environment. Some people enjoy their invisible status, lurking behind the scenes and observing, while others welcome a chance to elevate their status via their profiles, sharing and generally getting involved, some go beyond that and start communities maintaning order and dealing with bad behaviour from their memebers with a firm "BLOCK".

I was writing an article on 'community justice' for a client when i started to consider the idea of over crowding and loss of communities. The Māori’s for instance maintain community law by making criminals face their victims, this idea was preposterous to the western bureaucracy who see "law" not as a human element but a "rule" an unseen thing, rather like "god" i suppose and anything opposite to that is unworthy and barbaric.

The internet being a return to this barbarism and freedom of communication, the idea that a tight nit community could contain individuals that lived 100s of thousands of miles away from each other and yet, coexisted in a sentient space of collective information must be very frightening to those individuals wanting to control the spead of information (but thats a whole other post).

I started to think of our ancestors and how they lived within smaller groups as hunter gathers before the introduction of agriculture and then I thought of animals or rather insects, Ants to be exact. We share a lot of similarities with our ant friends, their use of propaganda, they solve complex problems, they develop mimetic, commensally, parasitic and mutualistic relationships with other species (such as milking aphids like cows and growing gardens from fungus, they fight to protect their homes their young and they also build incredible communities that can last for years.

LIFE IN THE INTER-GROWTH

Imagine you are David Attenborough for a second crawling on your belly through the inter-growth with a camera poised and you come across something never before observed.

if you did peer into the THE SOCIAL NEST, what would you expect to see?

Well you would definitely be looking for a number of members of this species that collectively make up the working community;

The Queen - Outbound (i.e. Elder) – Process of leaving the community due to new relationships, new positions, new outlooks

The Royal family - Boundary (i.e. Leader) – A leader, sustains membership participation and brokers interactions

The Workers ants - Inbound (i.e. Novice) – Newcomer is invested in the community and heading towards full participation

The Soldier ants - Insider (i.e. Regular) – Full committed community participant

The parasitic ant's - Peripheral (i.e. Lurker) – An outside, unstructured participation

The Larva - Relationships within the community

Rival ant - Spammer

“So what we can see here is the centre of activity for the nest, all this central activity you can see is a number of higher ranking individuals and workers activating and carrying various threads around, if we look closely we can see that these are “new widget technologies” a huge post about some thing called “plurk’ll never catch on” and one about a “local news story on knife crime”.

“Now we must be careful to remain very, very quiet as we sit here on the lip of the nest, so as not to disturb the buzz. If we make any comments or movements that could be mistaken for salesy in anyway the social ants may well pick up on our pheromones and may send their soldiers to block us”

“I’ll just back away just slightly as not to affect their natural behaviour, and this position I’m adopting is called a lurking posture, it means that I’m not going to interact with the nest and should make them ignore us”

Two smaller social ants pass by, within inches of your camera, they are acting rather peculiarly and so you watch as they tentatively enter the NEST.

“Now this is interesting, I was hoping we would be able to observe this behaviour. These are two possible lurkers or new workers for the community who are trying to blend in and might well try to interact given that they seam very interested in those larger threads there”

As you watch the two ants avoid contact with the other larger ants and hide themselves in the shadows behind a number of threads.

“Ahhh, It is looking more likely that there the parasitic ants or the 'lurkers' that I was describing, this could get ugly if they try to interact with the community straight away”

You pause “No, it seams I was wrong, one of them is beginning to interact with one of the smaller threads on “facebook” you can see it is carrying it across to a much larger ant that looks like a solider and nudging it with the tip of the thread, the other ant has now come in and is helping what appears to be a group of worker ants carry that enormous ‘matt cutts cat’ post”

“Now the reason why these ants were so careful when entering is that if the nest community picks up on their trust pheromones before they have a chance to prove themselves, there is a risk of the new ants being eaten alive”

“The new ants are now interacting with a number of threads and will hopefully be accepted into the community as workers, they may remain as workers for sometime, growing up the ranks until they are fully established enough to become solders creating food for thought for the entire nest”

“The soldiers are the ants over there, these are much bigger and brownish looking, they carrying a number of threads at once and are top contributors to the nest and pay a huge part in its stability by challenging any attack on the nest”

A number of much larger ants appear; they are much fatter and are carrying what appear to be maggots.

“Ahh now this very interesting, these are the elders and Royal family members, they all look very similar, you’ll notice that whitish grey tinge to their hind quarters, you also notice that they interact much less with the new ants and instead they are getting the Larva to regurgitate what look like more threads that the soldiers then carry to the workers who feeding on this and carrying it off into to centre of the nest”

You smile “It’s amasing to think that this chain reaction of elders and new comers or larva and lurkers is happening in thousands of millions of places, under our very noses in nests like these all over the web every second of every day”

Zemanta Pixie

Wednesday, 18 June 2008

Free Martini cocktail with every link added!

Ahhhrgggghhhh...

These days traditional link building is about as satisfying as squeezing a dogs anal glands.

When my task manager flashed up "link building" i would sob softly inside my skull and try not to snap another pencil, as the anticipated 3 straight hours of mind numbing unadulterated onesided email tennis would surely follow and from which i might only get at best 1, maybe two responses. Thankfully my manager Simon and i share the same desire to move away from this area and so we are slowly backing off traditional link building and adopting a more creative approach.

The awful thing is with every email i write to a webmaster or site owner i actually really care about their website and before long i am selling my grandmother to redevelop their homepage (well re-writing their meta tags and checking out their site for errors) and i always get disheartened when the "we only accept PR 5 sites" or "we get hundreds of these emails and no". WHAT HAPPENED TO LINK LOVE GUYS.. HUH???? are we all wearing virtual condoms these days?, i don't even know where to start with that "hem".

So the baby of change is crowning and it's all systems go!. (sorry, I heard that term 3 times this week already so just had to use it some where). Link bait, article syndication, corporate blogging, social networks, webpage consultancy, press releases and quality content writing are in the task list of tomorrow! and i say YIPEEE NO MORE LINK BUILDING..PERIOD!

Creepy cyber mutt; "YOUR WRONG CLAIRE - it's not all candy coated gerbils.. Link building still exists, just in less nauseating forms"

CLAIRE; "What do you mean "creepy looking cyber mutt" like what?"

Creepy cyber mutt; "Well theres; directory listings, association Listings, bartering for links on relevant Sites, reciprocal Links key industry Sites and Strategic Partnerships with other sites in your sector to mention but a few"

CLAIRE; "Why thanks for that CCM, thats given me some food for thought"

Creepy cyber mutt; "Can i eat Matt Cutts now?"

CLAIRE; "No weve talked about this before haven't we, right after the
Steve Ballmer incident"

Creepy cyber mutt; "I thought he was an egg"

Anyway.... so traditional link building isn't dead, it just needs to be considered alot more and not simply taken for granted as a way to show clients "hey, look were doing all this work" when in actual fact most of those link requests are close but no cigar.

These days we are road mapping the clients marketing for the whole year or at least six months and mapping out the campaign to embody this activity. Ok, so you don't have a nice chart to tick of the 10 sites you approached, but you'll have syndicated a great article resulting in a few 100 links back, organised a competition that gets the users excited and maybe a few mashups are created or simply the suggestions to alter the sites registered user page mean that your clients return rate goes through the roof.

And yadder yadder yadder... yadder yahh.

Zemanta Pixie

Saturday, 14 June 2008

Everybody hates "Jerry Yang!"

Jerry Yang and David Filo, the founders of Yahoo!Image via WikipediaUnless you've been living under a stone for around 5 months, or happen to be right side of Carl Icahn's brain, you'll know that the Microsoft / Yahoo financial romance is OFF!. Shareholders are furious and end users are licking their Google shaped wounds over the admission by Jerry Yang that Yahoo and Google have entered into a something reporters are calling "the Google/yahoo ad pact".

The news following the run up to this fallout and beyond has been like the discovery channel with herds of men racing around snapping and growling and trying desperately to protect their precious $30 shares. But alas, they were carried off in the night and mauled down to $3 each, poor little things.

So bad old Jerry Yang signed the pact with the devil, instead of sealing a deal with "the devil", but this devil is worse than that devil right?

£22.7 billion is a lot of money, so why would the CEO of Yahoo turn it down?

head throughout and the eyes of both end users "Well for one reason, i think the Nazi style tactics of Microsoft's Steve Ballmer and activist investor Carl Icahn can't have helped smooth the connection. It all seams to have been more of a gun shot wedding with a pistol aimed at Jerry Yangs head throughout and the eyes of end users disappointed in services" and shareholders "hungry for a cut of the pie" watching from the bleachers.

Yang has never wanted to sell out to Microsoft and i must admit that a correlation between two companies with influence in the paid advertising sector makes sense, especially in a non exclusive deal, even if that deal is with the "father of lies". Of course the deal will need to be signed of by all and sundry to make sure that it doesn't breach any laws, but it does look like it is going ahead.

So what now?

Well if Carl Icahn gets his way in early July, all 10 Yahoo board members including co developer / CEO Yang will be ousted in favour of a group of Ichans financial bedfellows and Ichan will continue to make Roy Bostock 'yahoos chairman' feel like his just added his old girlfriend to his facebook profile.

Is Jerry safe?

If the Google deal fails to improve the cost of Yahoo's shares then i would say not, at least not from investors and definitely not from Ichanzilla. It is a shame, but as it has been mentioned in the press Yang failed to impress during the conference call announcing the Google deal and everyone loves a CEO to be charismatic. Jerry Yang is smart and i think he has made an extremely brave move in the face of overwhelming criticism by shareholders and those who a few months ago would have put their hands up as "yahoo users".

Lets face it, Microsofts redeeming features on the web are MSN and not much else, Yahoo have branched out in the field of email, image and search (ok its trying) but at least it is trying, so why doesn't everyone just get off Jerry's back and wait to see exactly what this Google deal is all about. I for one admire Yahoo for not crumbling and selling out to the enemy.

Lets all try to "like" Jerry Yang a tad more, after all "You only get an oooo" with Yagloo.

Tuesday, 27 May 2008

Whose the 'daddy?' Bigstring email or Gmail...

Anti-Spam SMTP ProxyImage via WikipediaI've been testing a new email account for over a month now, its called 'bigstring email' and its USP is that it is the:

"The World's Coolest Free Web-based mail service, it provides free accounts with the best features for individuals, business, social networking. Big string email service is for secure, private, recallable, erasable email. Free and premium email accounts for business & personal e-mail address.

So because i was looking for a nice new email account to handle my link requests and i have a lot of time on my hands due to a lack of social obligations i felt the wind of EM change.

Big string offered 'sender regret' a bit like buyers remorse but electronic and less needs for floor length mirrors or assistants called 'Darren'. Basically you can recall an email that you send out mistake, handy if i have just emailed an baby clothes company offering a link trade with an online sperm donors. I thought it looked interesting and so i set-up a free account and began sending my link requests out using Big string instead of Gmail."

The features i loved were the tabbed windows, meaning i could plan out five emails at a time and the fact that you could track when the email had been viewed by the site owner and when, a handy function when chasing up requests etc as you had something to go on, but i wondered why a lot of my emails weren't even being opened, not even by Jill who thought I'd been the person sending her emails about penis enlargements. It wasn't until i had an email back from a webmaster in Texas saying he had found my email in his junk mail by accident that i suddenly realised what was happening.

I contacted Big string who replied promptly and said that this happens the first time but once the email is opened that it wont go into the trash again. But what if its never opened i cursed!

So i crept back to my Gmail account, took it out to dinner and bought it the new prison break (OK so that was for me) but i did as Jeff Coons to i Google and i am now using the big G again.

I am really missing the tabbing and tracking functions, as now i have no idea what happens to my lovingly crafted emails, are they read or simply abandoned in the trash.

Well.. better get some sleep. But i'll leave you with a few email related links.

Nite X



Wednesday, 9 April 2008

Free Open Source alternatives to PAYING THE MAN

Image from Flickr
jumping all night long...day 26 / year 2

Just literally stumbled this site and it's full to capicity with great tools that i know you'll all love.

Hope they come in handy:

http://downloadpedia.org/Open_Source_Alternative_to_Commercial_Software

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

Why arent webmasters more like guppies



I've been working on social media and link building for a few years now, its an arduous task at times and can be a thankless one. I always get really new world order over it, punching the air and singing "What the web..needs now, link love..link Love. But it usually falls on deaf ears, like I'm trying to sell ice to an Eskimo (whom i am assuming 'wrongly perhaps' has some).

I mean the links I'm offering are to relevant sites for their customers. I'm not that dumpy angry looking east end woman standing up on a high stool behind a market stall saying "You want relevance love, come on.. 2 for a paaand". No... I'm offering quality, helping them give their users a better service, improving the relevancy with keyword rich text in the anchors.

How do i know this? because i optimised the clients site in the first place and i know their business in side and out. My main concerns are for the user, the client and the webmaster, that means new content, ease of use and increased ROI.

But anyway, back to the Guppies. My guppies breed, they breed like its the last day on earth. Why? because they see another Guppy, they swim around it a bit, pop behind the plastic acropolis (tacky perhaps) and "watch it vicar" - a new life is created.

Now if my male Guppies were like webmasters and my female guppies were like links, the story would be very different. You'd have little link condoms all over, they'd be arguments over whether the male like blue tails or red tails, they'd want the females to bring them tiny gifts in return, and this would be hell on their fins. The result would be in many cases - No bambino el fino, or a very long gestation period of up to 12 months.

Ok, so my tank at the moment looks like I've been royally spammed, but - it would be nice, if webmasters would "give a little" rather than "take a lot and consider GOOD sites that help the traffic flow in the right direction instead of just how much money they can get from BAD SITES that send their users to the nearest "smiley friggin central".

OK, rant over.. i'm off to feed the fish

Friday, 4 April 2008

Self promotion in social media is unethical?



Whilst reading my one of my favorite blogs: www.copyblogger.com, i stumbled across a fantastic post entitled 'The Jim Morrison guide to strategic content promotion', now i wouldn't even try to paraphrase a genius like Brian Clark, but i do wish to embellish upon the point he made.Brain asked the question "are you OK with spending the time to create truly exceptional content while simply hoping that everyone “organically” discovers it?"

This is a very good point, i mean not everyone who has something vital and inspiration to say on the passionate subject of their choice will get those words read. I for one, would rather read this persons views than not, and if that means that a few of their friends spin, stumble or digg their post, then i think that's OK. I know that withing the social media area and the many networks, this kind of shameless self promotion would be frowned upon for not relying on its own merit. But i think it is safe to say that some people who are already well networked and do not have to work as hard as others to make their mark.

I'm sure that lots of people disagree with this, but i have poised my finger over the stumble or Sphinn button of one of my posts that i feel delivers an interesting opinion of a current issue or news item.

Online marketing banter did a fantastic post about "Is it a sin to Sphinn yourself", James was very brave in this post, pointing out the fact that although he is a regular Sphinn user and in his own words has been 'a pretty solid contributor'. But he admitted that he doesn't submit alot of articles and the those he does, tend to be his own. The reason being as a young blogger with a virtually virginal blog - if he didn't Sphinn his posts, who would?.

I'm almost done, but before i go, another post that caught my eye was the interestingly named 'The paradox of self-promotion with socail media'. Here it states "The Paradox of Self-Promotion with Social Media:

Social media generally frowns on self-promotion, in many cases admonishing outright those who practice it. But with the sheer numbers of new videos, posts, sites, pictures, and stories appearing each and every day, self-promotion is a necessity for anyone starting out and hoping to gain any sort of foothold."

It also gives some good Do's and Don'ts

I think this about round up the frustration felt - and it made me giggle:

I blog.

I blog about things that I dig.

So why wouldn't I Digg what I blog?

The way I see it, Digg is a way to show the world what you dig on the Internet.

If what you dig is something that you did, is it wrong to Digg it?



In the meantime, i think i'll balance up my sphinning of others with a few of my own of course.